The Radical Feminists Conviction Of Destroying Patriarchy Religion Essay

The Radical Feminists article of faith Of Destroying Patriarchy Religion EssayThemiscyra. The land of the amazons. In Greek mythology, it is a bum where no man is allowed to set foot in. A place where the woman is free from the abusive clutches of patriarchy. A delivern for wo hands and by women. Such a world would appeal to the substructure feminist.Ever since womens liberation park focus was birthed into the world, it kept evolving and becoming more drastic as the ages go by. ab initio a response to chauvinism and g stamp outer in representity, women only wanted an equal chance for themselves. However, there argon those who pushed it to the extreme. Thus, womens lib has trans molded into its most injurious function, al-Qaeda feminism. Its mission is to destroy patriarchy and separatelything that is associated with it. Radical feminisms raiseite targets argon the institution of mating, the Church, as well as Christianity. A once, good and bonny act, feminism has b een reformed into a damaging tool. And it has started hammering.However, the inquiryers retrieve that knowledge some innate feminism would be the best defense against it. By exposing its foul ways by dint of and through the use of Church t apieceings and Sacred volume, single may be able to guard against it. The City of Themiscyra would never be established. pedagogy of the ProblemThe problem that we face with congregationing feminism is the lack of nurture of the negative ideologies that it subtly disseminates through media.Today, media has become more relevant to some(prenominal) peoples lives. Feminisms goal of pursuing equality through the empowerment of women blurs with radical feminisms chief(a) goal. Radical feminism basically campaigns their ideologies through different media. Radical feminism gives women the inclination that they do not need a man to be completely gracious. The last statement is against what the Church taught men and women-to love each some other as they love themselves.That organism said, the questioners countenance identified the problems to beThe lack of information well-nigh radical feminismhow radical feminism subtly affects the people as main patrons of mediahow radical feminism ideologies adjustment peoples pick up on marriageResearchThe National Commission on the Role of Philippine Women defines feminism as A worldwide gesture that seeks to raise womens political, economic and social status and fights for gender equality in all aspects of life in all societies. The concepts underlying feminism abide to evolve according to the socioeconomic, political and cultural context in which the lawsuit is taking place.There argon many different kind-hearteds of feminism and writer Masilungan defines oneness kind of feminism liberal feminism. It emphasizes social and legal reforms through policies designed to fabricate equal opportunities. She claims that liberal feminism underpins mainstreaming efforts that le ad to all-embracing changes in womens legal rights and status.According to her another(prenominal) token is cultural feminism. It contends that there be fundamental soulality residuals in the midst of women and men, that sexism can be subjugate by celebrating womens special qualities, womens ways and womens experiences. In line with this, cultural feminists believe that womens ways are bankrupt, and that propagating these ways would make the world a break away place. The explanation besides goes on by mentioning that there would be no more wars if women were to rule nations because women have a gentler, kinder nature.Ecofenimism is as well as another form of feminism. Ecofeminism rests on the basic principle that patriarchy is harmful to women, children and other existent beings, and often draws from parallelism between a male-dominated hunting lodges exploitative treatment of the purlieu and its resources, and its treatment of women.These are some of the flakes of fe minism but the focus of this writing is radical feminism which can be defined as a type of feminism which looks at gender as the primary form of oppression and sees class and race as extensions of patriarchal domination. Most of its strategies are focused on reshaping consciousness and redefining social relations to create a woman-centered culture (Masilungan 2003).To compare with other types of feminism, radical feminism is a relatively new branch of feminism. Scalon claims that radical feminism started out during the second shiver of feminism which was in the 70s, around the late 60s to the mid-70s (129). Before the second undulation of feminism womens lives were centered on their husbands and their roles as just vexs or wives (Hobbs 19). It is also a relatively new branch of feminism in the posture that radical feminism may be seen as a ending of the inadequacy of its predecessor, liberal feminism. Compared to liberal feminism, radical feminism provides aims to restructur e the society by abolishing patriarchy (OConnor 61). some tell-tale signs can be seen regarding the radical feminists ideologies. altogetheran turner basically summarizes it by claiming that they are Anti-Bible, Anti-God and Anti-Christ. Being anti-Bible can be seen from American feminist and theologian, Rosmary Ruethers speech marks Feminist piety moldiness(prenominal) create a new textual base, a new canon. Feminist theology cannot be done from the existing base of the Christian Bible. It is also being Anti-God. Naomi Goldenberg, a professor at the University of Ottawa, claims that God is going to changeWe women are going to bring an end to GodWe will be the end of Him. Allan Turners claim that radical feminism is anti-Christ stems from the fact that radical feminists reject the idea of Son of Man because it is too masculine. Their being radical is also manifested on their views regarding sex. Murray, the author of Confessions of an Ex-Feminist, mentions in his interview with Olson that for the radical feminists, sex is just another physical act that brings pleasure and nothing more. This is contrary to the religious view on marriage because sex should only be done between a man and a woman bonded together by marriage.Many research studies have turn out the benefits of marriage. The research by Waite mentions that the benefits of marriage implicate better quality of the marriage relationship of the couple, brings in better health for the two because the relationship in itself allows the two people to grow with better resources and lesser costs of living (3). He also claims that marriage lessens notion and alcohol abusebetter psychological health for both husband and married woman (3). More everyplace, the research shows that the benefits of marriage are not just limited to husband and wife but also to children. Children who grow up with their biological and intact families are well-off because the environment is most suitable for the childrens develo pment (Parke 9). Acs and Nelson also clear shows that the benefit of marriage by stressing that children who are living with non-married parents fare worse than children living with their married parents (1).Many pivotal benefits of marriage have been proven by many researchers and yet, the radical feminists want to destroy the family tradition, a commit according to Gods creation. First of all, they want to destroy the handed-down family structure which consists of father, mother and children because they see this condition as women being subjugated by men husbands (Snyder-Hall 257). They also pursue lesbianism and same-sex marriage in order to eliminate the oppressiveness of women. This would mean that they could practice liberation to its fullness (Snyder-Hall 255). Their attempts to destroy the traditional family are starting to grow as a political and social movement as well. According to Ubacs news article, the prominent feminist party-list assort in the Philippines, Ga briela, has re-filed their bill to legalize divorce. The news article further detailed the womens party-list groups other grounds for filing for divorce, for example, irreparable marriages.The media has also been a proprietor of radical feminism. Although subtle, some movies have themes regarding radical feminism. A recent film of Jennifer Aniston, The Switch, it touches on the idea of how women can live without men and how women can get significant without a husband or a man.The radical feminists attempts to destroy the traditional form of marriage, however, are against the teaching of the Bible. Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure (New American Bible, Hebrews 13.4). The Bibles view of marriage and sexuality is also very holy unlike radical feminists corrupting view of these. He who finds a wife finds happiness it is a favor he receives from the LORD (Proverbs 18.22). It is also shown by Mark who says But from the outgrowth of creation, God made the m male and female. For this reason a man shall provide his father and mother (and be joined to his wife), and the two shall become one flesh. So they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate (Mark 10.6-9).With respect to the teaching of the Bible, the church also stands against the radical feminists burden of view and teaches otherwise. Mulieris Dignitatem 31 says that thereforethe Church gives thanks for each and every womanfor mothers, for sisters, for wives for women consecrated to God in virginity for women dedicated to the many human beings who await the gratuitous love of another soulfulness for women who watch over the human persons in the family, which is the fundamental sign of the human community for women who conk out professionally, and who at times are burdened by a gigantic social responsibility It is also said in Paragraph 14 of Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Therefore, the promotion of women within society must be understood and desired as a humanization cultivated through those values, rediscovered thanks to women. Every outlook which presents itself as a contrast between the sexes is only an illusion and a danger Without prejudice to the increase of womens rights in society and the family, these observations seek to correct the perspective which views men as enemies to be overcome. The proper condition of the male-female relationship cannot be a kind of mistrustful and defensive opposition. Their relationship needs to be lived in peaceableness and in the happiness of parcel of landd love.Objectives of the ProjectUpon presenting the adequate to(p) matter the group increased cognisance about radical feminism as a modern type of thinking, constituentd what the Churchs stand about this radical type of thinking is and shared information on how radical feminists work their way through media to establish their stand against the traditional marriage.Methodo logyIn implementing the regard the researchers collaborated with Rev. Ariel Jornales, the director of the Evangelical Theological College of the Philippines (ETCP). Rev. Jornales agreed to have us share our research with his students. Upon following up our schedule, he told the group that he proclaimed to all students of ETCP to depend our talk if they are interested. The writ of execution happened at prideful 25, 2010 and the allotted time for the researchers to present was two hours, from 10 am to 12 noon. The implementation took place at Lot 1, Block 1, Birds of Paradise St. vale Golf Subdivision. Cainta, Rizal. The audience consisted of professors, pastors and Theology students. The researchers took turns in presenting different parts of the subject matter. First, an icebreaker was initiated by the presenters. The audience was tasked to read some quotations from renowned radical feminists and provide feedback regarding a quotation. After this the researchers provided a shor t history about the subject matter. The presenters then moved into the meat of the matter and discussed the Sacred Scripture and Churchs stand on the issue. An open forum was conducted after the talk and further discussions with the audience was entertained. The group presented for an hour and the open forum lasted for thirty minutes. All in all, not more than 250 Php was spent for transportation and photocopying expenses.Data innovation and AnalysisBefore presenting the projects data, it is important to recall what this projects objectives were and these were the followingto increase awareness about radical feminism as a modern type of thinkingto share what the Churchs stand about this radical type of thinking is andto share information on how radical feminists work their way through media to establish their stand against the traditional marriage.These objectives are the basis of how well the implementation went, relative to the results. To present the data in a more nonionized m anner, the group decided to divide the notification of the data into two. This was because for flakes 1-5, the students were asked to come a Likert scale, while for numbers 6-8, they were asked to dissolver questions in sentences.For numbers 1-5, the researchers tallied the students answers for each item among the choices presented Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, and Strongly Agree, which we presented in the graph below. Additional information regarding the data presented are indicated below the graph.Figure I.Responses for questions 1 to 5* further 19 of the expected 35 attended the talk. For number 3, one person did not answer that particular item.For numbers 6-8, we had to be particularly easy with some of the items that may seem ambiguous, because several of the students expressed difficulty in answering in English, although they preferred to answer in English.Figure II.Responses for questions number 6 to 8For 7.b, one person was unable to finish writing. Howev er, her answer was counted under Answered, because the beginning of what she wrote (the word ANTI- with a line after the hyphen) would have been anti-Bible, which is a relevant answer to the question.It is disconcerting that three people windlessness think that all forms of feminism are anti-Christian after the talk. It is also unsettling that basketball team people think that feminism is anti-patriarchal, two people protest that radical feminism is incompatible with traditional marriage, three people strongly disagree that radical feminism believes in same-sex marriage and divorce, and one person strongly disagrees that Christianity promotes the rights and dignity of women.It is possible that some of them simply did not read the military rating form carefully, or answered in haste since they had a class to attend after.It is also possible that not everyone understood the talk because the medium of knowledge used was English. The bulk of them king have been more comfortable wi th Filipino, as some of them expressed when they asked to speak in Filipino during the activity. Despite this, majority of the students not only answered the items, but they also answered them based on the presentation of the group.Summary, Conclusions, RecommendationsRadical feminism is one kind of feminism, like its roots, is for womens equality and liberty from subjugation. This goal might be a little positive but, the fling of the movement comes from their radical thought that patriarchy is the root of all the unlikeness that the people are experiencing and sought to be eradicated. They propose a positive eradication of men. It seeps subtly through media, although not visible to a person with no knowledge of the movement there are shows and movies which basically support the movements ideologies.The results of the implementation showed that there is not enough information about radical feminism. Radical feminism as a movement is also misunderstood. Also, it is relatively ne w to the groups audience and is therefore considered to be good that they were able to share this new learning with them and although it was quite new, majority of the audience were able to have a basic understanding of the topic.For groups that would do a further research and implementation on the topic, the recommendations of the group are as followsProvide a more Filipino context for the researches. As what the group found out during the open forum that was held after the lecture, there is a significant come up of literature that could be referenced when putting radical feminism in the Filipino context.Tackle more a bit on the difference of radical feminism and other forms of radical feminism. This could be more expounded on by future groups as this was briefly discussed by the researchers. Also, if the future group provides clarity on the different forms of feminism (other than radical feminism) the audience might be able to grasp more of what radical feminism is and what it is not. practice a medium of language that is best for the audience. Based on the groups rating forms and analysis of data, the content of the presentation might have been better if Filipino or Tagalog was used in explaining the groups points.