The Impeachment of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton :: Politics Political

Impeachment is the ultiomate punishment for a prexy. It is a long and complicated rout to removing a public ex officio from office. The Constitutional process Article II, section 4 specifies the procedures to be utilise to remove a public ordained from office(CNN/All Politics). The constitution states that and president found guilty for bribery, treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. There has been a long debate on what should be considered a high crime. distinct people in the House share different views. Ultimately it is up to the Hose to decide to drop the charges or further the investigation. If the public official is found guilty a two thirds majority vote from the Senate is necessary. The close to recent president to face an impeachment hearing was Bill Clinton. A previous(prenominal) case involving Richard Nixon, Watergate, was held in 1974. Rather than facing an embarrassment with impeachment Nixon chose to resign in disgrace.Both cases were very much similar yet different. In the Watergate malicious gossip many of Nixons dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies,a number of which became targets of IRS tax audits, wiretapping, governmental sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and smear campaigns(Geriouese). Similarly, as Clintons case unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more(prenominal) than just a sexual assault. It was clear that the Republicans were out to get precedent President Clinton, when the Whitewater case emerged. Republicans were desperate to find Clinton guilty of covering up financial impropriety in his Arkansa invenvestments prior to becoming president. When speacial prosecutor Robert Fiske jr. turned up no evidence, Republicans demanded his removal. Kenneth Starr was appointed the position. He began an open-ended interrogative into every corner of Clintons life. Clinton was ultimetly found not guilty.The first major set back of President Bill Clinton arose from a series of events undermenti oned the filing of a lawsuit on May 6, 1994, by Paula Jones in the United States District tap for the Eastern District of atomic number 18(Starr). Ms. Jones alleged violations of her national civil rights in 1991 by President Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas and she was an Arkansas state employee. According to the her allegations, Governor Clinton invited Ms. Jones to his hotel room where he do a sexual advance that she rejected. Clintons attorneys tried to get the caes to rest until his term as president was over. The Supreme Court decide against the recommendation and the court proceeded.